The Zimdancehall Awards have recently come under intense scrutiny, with fans and industry insiders accusing the organizers of bias. The controversy centers around the awards' organizer, Blessing Jena, a well-known Zimbabwean blogger and creative based in South Africa, who allegedly nominated himself and his media company, Havok Live, under the Best Online Media category.

Critics argue that the inclusion of Jena's platform raises questions of fairness and objectivity. Havok Live is competing alongside respected industry giants such as Earground, Eyes of 263, and other prominent online media powerhouses. Fans have expressed their frustration, claiming that the nominations reflect a conflict of interest and undermine the credibility of the awards.

Social media platforms have been buzzing with debate, as many Zimdancehall enthusiasts feel the awards show is no longer a fair reflection of the industry’s talent and contributions. Some fans are calling for a more transparent and impartial process in future editions of the Zimdancehall Awards, urging the organizers to avoid self-nominations or personal interests to restore trust.

While Blessing Jena has yet to publicly address the concerns, the backlash highlights a larger issue within award ceremonies: maintaining the integrity and trust of both the public and the artists. As the Zimdancehall community grows, there are increasing calls for reform in the way these awards are managed to ensure they remain credible and continue to celebrate genuine talent and achievements within the genre.

It remains to be seen how the organizers will respond to the criticism, but the controversy has certainly ignited a larger conversation about fairness and accountability in Zimbabwe's music industry.